<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Video Station: (303) 440-4448 &#187; sci-fi / fantasy</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thevideostation.com/blog/category/movie-reviews/sci-fi-fantasy/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thevideostation.com/blog</link>
	<description>1661 28th St Boulder, CO  (303) 440-4448</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 05:01:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>THE THING &#8211; Reviewed by Will</title>
		<link>http://thevideostation.com/blog/2012/02/02/the-thing-reviewed-by-will/</link>
		<comments>http://thevideostation.com/blog/2012/02/02/the-thing-reviewed-by-will/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2012 23:20:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>blogadmin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[blu-ray]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[horror]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[movie reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sci-fi / fantasy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thevideostation.com/blog/?p=5932</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It&#8217;s a bit surprising to consider that nearly as many years have elapsed since John Carpenter&#8217;s 1982 sci-fi thriller The Thing as between it and its own predecessor, 1951&#8217;s The Thing From Another World, directed by Howard Hawks. Both are widely considered to be classics in the sci-fi horror genres, so a third version has [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div><img class="alignleft" style="margin: 5px;" title="The Thing DVD 2011" src="http://www.thevideostation.com/boxart/TheThing2011.jpg" alt="" width="98" height="140" />It&#8217;s a bit surprising to consider that nearly as many years have elapsed since <strong>John Carpenter</strong>&#8217;s 1982 sci-fi thriller <em><strong>The Thing</strong></em> as between it and its own predecessor, 1951&#8217;s <em><strong>The Thing From Another World</strong></em>, directed by <strong>Howard Hawks</strong>. Both are widely considered to be classics in the sci-fi horror genres, so a third version has a lot to live up to. This new <em>Thing</em>, by first-time Dutch director <strong>Matthijs van Heijningen Jr.</strong>,  is not so much a remake as it is a prequel to Carpenter&#8217;s. Fans of that  film will remember that the crew of American Antarctic Outpost 31  encounter a helicopter pursuing a lone sled dog and attempting to kill  it, later discovering that nearby Norwegian researchers had uncovered an  alien spacecraft buried in the ice for eons, and thawed out a deadly  alien organism that proved to be their undoing.</p>
<p><span id="more-5932"></span>This new film  chronicles exactly what happened to the Norwegian team, which is  conveniently augmented by enough Americans (in particular <strong>Mary Elizabeth Winstead</strong>,  who inevitably becomes a Ripley-esque heroine) to allow most of the  dialogue to be politely spoken in English. Winstead&#8217;s character, Kate  Lloyd, is a paleontologist recruited to assist when the ancient flying  saucer is discovered along with its frozen passenger. Lloyd soon butts  heads with the snooty head of the Norwegian base, Dr. Halvorson (<strong>Ulrich Thomsen</strong>),  who presses on with studying his new find despite her warnings. The  creature escapes from its block of ice and proceeds to devour&#8211;and  perfectly duplicate&#8211;its victims.</p>
<p>One compelling aspect of the <em>Thing</em> films, which distinguishes them from a great many horror flicks, is  that their characters are educated and rational people, not histrionic  teenagers lined up to be chainsaw fodder. The best weapon against the  Thing, apart from a reliable and fully-fueled flame thrower, is the  Scientific Method itself. As intense and grisly as the creature effects  in Carpenter&#8217;s film were, it really unfolded more as a logic problem  than an action movie. In order to eliminate the alien menace, one had to  be cool-headed and methodical in figuring out exactly who was&#8211;and who  wasn&#8217;t&#8211;infected by it. This is what provided most of the tension.</p>
<p>Van  Heijningen&#8217;s prequel follows most of the same story beats as before,  and it shows immense respect for the details established in Carpenter&#8217;s  film. For instance, when <strong>Kurt Russell</strong> and Co. scouted  the wreckage of the Norwegian camp in 1982, they spied a fire-axe  embedded ominously in a wall. You can bet you&#8217;ll see how and why that  axe ended up there. But, despite all of its slavish attention to detail,  this one doesn&#8217;t really have much tension or menace of its own. The  camera drifts lazily across character&#8217;s faces without any particular  attention or style. The question of who has been replaced by the alien  is given its due, even with a couple new and clever twists, but our  heroes seem to come up with the same ideas used in the previous film  without following the same logical steps to get there. Winstead&#8217;s  character may be clever, but sometimes it feels like she&#8217;s got intuition  bordering on psychic powers. Eventually too much time is spent running  from room to room chasing after something that very obviously needs to  be killed.</p>
<p>Bottom line: if you&#8217;ve never seen either of its forebears, some of the twists in this <em>Thing</em> might be effective. If you&#8217;re a fan of Carpenter&#8217;s version, you&#8217;ll  probably get a mild kick out of seeing all of the references to it. But  the movie taken on its own really isn&#8217;t as exciting, despite solid  performances and mostly effective creature effects. -<strong> [DVD] [Blu-Ray]</strong></p>
</div>
<div><strong><br />
</strong></div>
<div><strong>Horror/Mystery/Sci-Fi</p>
<p></strong><strong>Rated R</strong></p>
</div>
<div><strong><br />
</strong></div>
<div><strong>DVD Release Date: 1/31/12</strong></div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://thevideostation.com/blog/2012/02/02/the-thing-reviewed-by-will/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>IN TIME &#8211; Reviewed by David</title>
		<link>http://thevideostation.com/blog/2012/02/02/in-time-reviewed-by-david/</link>
		<comments>http://thevideostation.com/blog/2012/02/02/in-time-reviewed-by-david/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2012 23:19:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>blogadmin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[action/adventure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[movie reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sci-fi / fantasy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[suspense/thrillers]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thevideostation.com/blog/?p=5930</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Imagine the young people in Logan&#8217;s Run dropping dead when they hit thirty instead of being executed and you have the basic idea for In Time,  writer/director Andrew Niccol&#8217;s sleek sci-fi effort starring Justin  Timberlake and Amanda Seyfried that manages to overcome lackluster  acting and poor plot development  thanks to its [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignright" style="margin: 5px;" title="In Time DVD 2011" src="http://www.thevideostation.com/boxart/InTime2011.jpg" alt="" width="98" height="140" />Imagine the young people in <em><strong>Logan&#8217;s Run</strong></em> dropping dead when they hit thirty instead of being executed and you have the basic idea for <em><strong>In Time</strong></em>,  writer/director <strong>Andrew Niccol</strong>&#8217;s sleek sci-fi effort starring <strong>Justin  Timberlake</strong> and <strong>Amanda Seyfried</strong> that manages to overcome lackluster  acting and poor plot development  thanks to its intriguing premise and  striking cinematography.</p>
<div>
<p><span id="more-5930"></span>Like <em><strong>Gattaca</strong></em>,  Niccol&#8217;s 1997 debut  feature, it deals with class division via human  genetic manipulation,  positing a future in which people are genetically  engineered to stop  aging at 25 and will die within a year unless they  literally acquire  more time. The rich can live forever, while others,  like Timberlake&#8217;s  factory worker, struggle, until tragic circumstances  inspire Timberlake  to take action.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s  a setup that&#8217;s certainly timely, what with the  growing problem of  overpopulation, but Niccol fails to make it  profound, sticking in a few  half-hearted nobody-wants-to-live-forever  and you-haven&#8217;t-really-lived  conversations and, in a probable bid to  attract a larger audience,  turning the film into a Robin Hood-style  action thriller.</p>
<p>Better  actors might have made something of the  material, but we&#8217;re stuck with  Timberlake and Seyfried as the leads.  Timberlake is seriously  dull&#8211;even his crying feels forced&#8211;while  Seyfried, as the daughter of a  time-wealthy businessman (<strong>Vincent  Kartheiser</strong>), gives horribly wooden line readings and wears a wig that  makes her look utterly ridiculous.</p>
<p>As  well the old-people-who-look-young angle doesn&#8217;t  quite work. The young  actors just aren&#8217;t convincing enough, especially  Kartheiser, who  sounds too much like a kid trying to be a grown-up. Then  again, cast  elders <strong>Matt Bomer</strong> and <strong>Cillian Murphy</strong> look nothing close to  twenty-five, but do give the better performances,  even if Murphy&#8217;s  intriguing time-cop role never develops into much of  anything.</p>
<p>And  yet I ultimately liked the movie, partly  because Niccol gives it such a  cool, retro-futuristic look and feel,  from the time cop cars and  Timberlake&#8217;s buzz cut, to the L.A. locations  where it was all filmed.  Niccol also orchestrates action surprisingly  well, as evidenced by a  car chase in which Timberlake ends up driving in  reverse.</p>
<p>What  really sold it for me was all the details  Niccol comes up: the glowing  green countdown clocks on people&#8217;s arms,  the way people literally give  and take time from each other, the time  zones that separate rich from  poor, the time-stealing gangsters called  Minutemen. When Timberlake  buys a car, he pays 59 years. When he and Kartheiser play cards, they  bet up to two centuries.</p>
<p>Just  like humanity now, though, stress and drinking  and smoking take years  off the characters&#8217; lives. Literally. Banks loan  out time, but still  charge high interest rates, and leave people living  on borrowed time.  Literally. One character, quite literally, runs out  of time. And me,  well, I thought the movie was, all in all, a pretty  good time. &#8211;  <strong>[DVD] [Blu-Ray]</strong></p>
<p><strong>Action/Sci-Fi/Thriller</strong></p>
<p><strong> </strong><strong><strong>Rated PG-13</strong></strong></p>
<p><strong><strong>DVD Release Date: 1/31/12<br />
</strong></strong></p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://thevideostation.com/blog/2012/02/02/in-time-reviewed-by-david/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>REAL STEEL &#8211; Reviewed by David</title>
		<link>http://thevideostation.com/blog/2012/01/27/real-steel-reviewed-by-david/</link>
		<comments>http://thevideostation.com/blog/2012/01/27/real-steel-reviewed-by-david/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jan 2012 04:10:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>blogadmin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[action/adventure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[drama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[movie reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sci-fi / fantasy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thevideostation.com/blog/?p=5900</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If you want to get technical about it, director Shawn Levy&#8217;s Real Steel is not an official adaptation of the Rock &#8216;Em Sock &#8216;Em Robots game, but  it may as well be, because I can&#8217;t imagine any other film employing the  admittedly silly idea of boxing robots being as wholly enjoyable as  [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignright" style="margin: 10px;" title="Real Steel DVD 2011" src="http://www.thevideostation.com/boxart/RealSteel2011.jpg" alt="" width="98" height="140" />If you want to get technical about it, director <strong>Shawn Levy</strong>&#8217;s <em><strong>Real Steel</strong></em> is not an official adaptation of the Rock &#8216;Em Sock &#8216;Em Robots game, but  it may as well be, because I can&#8217;t imagine any other film employing the  admittedly silly idea of boxing robots being as wholly enjoyable as  this slick, family-friendly <strong>Hugh Jackman</strong> vehicle.</p>
<p><span id="more-5900"></span>Loosely based on a 1950s short story by <strong>Richard Matheson</strong> that was also the basis for a <em><strong>Twilight Zone</strong></em> episode, it&#8217;s set in 2020, when mechanical boxers have replaced human  ones, and casts Jackman as an ex-fighter scraping out a living entering  secondhand robots in unsanctioned matches whose life takes a turn when  he takes temporary custody of his preteen son (<strong>Dakota Goyo</strong>).</p>
<p>The script is equal parts <em><strong>Rocky</strong></em> and <em><strong>Over the Top</strong></em>,  and so is predictable, and is peppered with dialogue that will have  some rolling their eyes. &#8220;I want you to fight for me,&#8221; Goyo tells  Jackman at one point. &#8220;That&#8217;s all I ever wanted.&#8221; As well Goyo is  improbably made out to be an expert robot programmer simply because he  plays a lot of video games.</p>
<p>And yet, the film works, incredibly  so, in part because Levy not only manages to fashion such an  interesting, lived-in world, with its myriad styles of robots and the  idea of a World Robot Boxing league, but makes the bot battles  themselves fun and energetic exhibitions full of rock music and crowds  of people cheering wildly as mechanical behemoths pound away at each  other.</p>
<p>What&#8217;s more, Levy (<em><strong>Night at the Museum</strong></em>)  infuses the film with lots of heart, making the characters feel  surprisingly real and ensuring that we genuinely care for them. As corny  as it may sound, the film really is about Jackman and Goyo bonding, and  less about fighting robots, though I suppose an exception could be made  for Atom, the instantly endearing sparring robot Goyo saves from a  junkyard.</p>
<p>Granted, Levy gets a lot help from his cast, starting  with Jackman, who gives a great performance, capably conveying con-man  charm, don&#8217;t-bother-me-kid gruffness and palpable paternal feelings. He  gets a wonderful co-star in Goyo, who possesses surprising poise and  emotional range for a 12-year-old, and lends the film a contagious  exuberance. He and Jackman play off each other so well you almost forget  about all the impressively rendered CGI automatons around them.</p>
<p>To all that you can add ex-<em><strong>Lost</strong></em> beauty <strong>Evangeline Lilly</strong>.  As Jackman&#8217;s childhood buddy/romantic interest, she combines  feistiness, intelligence and vulnerability into a very appealing  package, becoming more than just the shoulder Jackman cries on. I  especially liked the scene in which she fills Goyo in on his father&#8217;s  career, though her rooftop reconciliation with Jackman is a nicely  tender moment.</p>
<p>As well <strong>Danny Elfman</strong>&#8217;s excellent score not only sounds like something <strong>Trevor Rabin</strong> might have composed (a good thing in my book), it succeeds in making  the action feel rousing and triumphant, and the quieter moments  poignant. Suffice it to say that, if you don&#8217;t smile when Goyo teaches  Atom to dance, or cry even one tear during the big-match finale, then  you must be a machine. &#8211; <strong>[DVD]</strong></p>
<p><strong>Action/Drama/Sci-Fi</p>
<p>Rated PG-13</strong></p>
<p><strong>DVD Release Date: 1/24/12</strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://thevideostation.com/blog/2012/01/27/real-steel-reviewed-by-david/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>DON&#8217;T BE AFRAID OF THE DARK &#8211; Reviewed by David</title>
		<link>http://thevideostation.com/blog/2012/01/06/dont-be-afraid-of-the-dark-reviewed-by-david/</link>
		<comments>http://thevideostation.com/blog/2012/01/06/dont-be-afraid-of-the-dark-reviewed-by-david/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jan 2012 03:32:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>blogadmin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[horror]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[movie reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sci-fi / fantasy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[suspense/thrillers]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thevideostation.com/blog/?p=5813</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Just so we&#8217;re clear, Guillermo del Toro didn&#8217;t direct this big screen version of a 1973 TV movie. He co-wrote and, as with 2007&#8217;s The Orphanage, produced it. I mention this so you don&#8217;t think him responsible for what turns out to be an unscary little horror flick.
It  does, however, employ his oft-used theme [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div><img class="alignright" style="margin: 10px;" title="Don't Be Afraid of the Dark DVD 2011" src="http://www.thevideostation.com/boxart/DontBeAfraidOfTheDark2011.jpg" alt="" width="98" height="140" />Just so we&#8217;re clear, <strong>Guillermo del Toro</strong> didn&#8217;t direct this big screen version of a 1973 TV movie. He co-wrote and, as with 2007&#8217;s <em><strong>The Orphanage</strong></em>, produced it. I mention this so you don&#8217;t think him responsible for what turns out to be an unscary little horror flick.</p>
<p><span id="more-5813"></span>It  does, however, employ his oft-used theme of children encountering  supernatural or fantastical elements, focusing on a little girl (<strong>Bailee Madison</strong>) forced to go live with her architect father (<strong>Guy Pearce</strong>) and stepmother (<strong>Katie Holmes</strong>)  in a 19th century Rhode Island mansion the pair is restoring, where she  becomes the target of tiny goblin-like creatures inhabiting the ash pit  in the home&#8217;s basement.</p>
<p>As long as we don&#8217;t actually see the creatures, the film really isn&#8217;t that bad. Director <strong>Troy Nixey</strong> succeeds, at least for a while, in making the big old house itself  nicely creepy, especially in any scene with Bailee in bed, bathed in the  light of her carousel lamp. And he gets a great little actress in  Bailee, who convincingly conveys a decent range of emotions.</p>
<p>Thing  is, the creatures themselves, when we finally do see them, really  aren&#8217;t that scary. Oh, they&#8217;re ugly, hunchbacked little CGI things who  can swarm all over a man and nearly kill him, but they look just a  little too adorable. The only time they&#8217;re even kind of frightening is  in the drawings of them Holmes discovers at one point, or when we hear  their whispers emanating from the ash pit.</p>
<p>Pearce and Holmes do  adequate work, and the script manages to eke out some genuine emotional  resonance with the resentment-at-the-stepmother angle. But we know from  the start that the girl will warm up to Holmes. Sigh. If only del Toro  himself had been the director. Then I might really have been afraid of  the watching this movie, in the light or the dark. &#8211;  <strong>[DVD]</strong></div>
<div><strong><br />
</strong></div>
<div><strong>Fantasy/Horror/Thriller</p>
<p>Rated R</strong></div>
<div><strong><br />
</strong></div>
<div><strong>DVD Release Date: 1/3/12</strong></div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://thevideostation.com/blog/2012/01/06/dont-be-afraid-of-the-dark-reviewed-by-david/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>APOLLO 18 &#8211; Reviewed by Will</title>
		<link>http://thevideostation.com/blog/2011/12/29/apollo-18-reviewed-by-will/</link>
		<comments>http://thevideostation.com/blog/2011/12/29/apollo-18-reviewed-by-will/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Dec 2011 20:15:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>blogadmin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[horror]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[movie reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sci-fi / fantasy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[suspense/thrillers]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thevideostation.com/blog/?p=5777</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div><strong><em><img class="alignleft" style="margin: 10px;" title="Apollo 18 DVD " src="http://www.thevideostation.com/boxart/A</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://thevideostation.com/blog/2011/12/29/apollo-18-reviewed-by-will/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>RISE OF THE PLANET OF THE APES &#8211; Reviewed by Will</title>
		<link>http://thevideostation.com/blog/2011/12/16/rise-of-the-planet-of-the-apes-reviewed-by-will/</link>
		<comments>http://thevideostation.com/blog/2011/12/16/rise-of-the-planet-of-the-apes-reviewed-by-will/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Dec 2011 03:11:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>blogadmin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[action/adventure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[blu-ray]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[drama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[movie reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[recommendations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sci-fi / fantasy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thevideostation.com/blog/?p=5718</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The original Planet of the Apes franchise, spanning five films from the original 1968 Charlton Heston movie to 1973&#8217;s Battle for the Planet of the Apes,  was equal parts science fiction and social satire. It turned out that  people wearing chimp costumes were remarkably versatile in service of  the latter goal, making [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div><img class="alignleft" style="margin: 10px;" title="Rise of the Planet of the Apes DVD 2011" src="http://www.thevideostation.com/boxart/RiseOfThePlanetOfTheApes201.jpg" alt="" width="98" height="140" />The original <em><strong>Planet of the Apes</strong></em> franchise, spanning five films from the original 1968 <strong>Charlton Heston</strong> movie to 1973&#8217;s <em><strong>Battle for the Planet of the Apes</strong></em>,  was equal parts science fiction and social satire. It turned out that  people wearing chimp costumes were remarkably versatile in service of  the latter goal, making effective caricatures for examining creationism,  race relations, animal rights, fascism, even meteoric celebrity. The  whole thing formed a surprisingly tidy narrative pretzel, a time travel  story founded on a predestination paradox, where the founder of ape  civilization&#8211;Caesar&#8211;was himself its ultimate product.</p>
<p><span id="more-5718"></span>There are many factors that make <em><strong>Rise of the Planet of the Apes</strong></em> so successful at re-imagining the Apes franchise. First of all, it  apparently wasn&#8217;t even originally conceived as a remake at all&#8211;rather,  the writers were initially more interested in the perilous modern  phenomenon of humans raising chimpanzees in their homes. Combining that  thread with the emerging potential of genetic engineering, they  fashioned a story about an exceedingly intelligent chimp raised and  eventually mistreated by humans, who is forced to abandon human society  and find a new place amongst his own kind. Broaden the scope a little,  and you have the ingredients for a planet of apes.</p>
<p>As much as its title telegraphs the outcome, <em>Rise</em> is peculiarly engrossing. Much of this is thanks to <strong>Andy Serkis</strong>, the actor who pioneered motion capture performance when playing <em><strong>Lord of the Rings</strong></em>&#8216; Gollum and <em><strong>King Kong</strong></em>.  His performance as Caesar is the genuine centerpiece of the film, an  entirely computer-generated character that in fact evokes the  expressive, non-verbal acting of the Silent Era. Particularly during its  second half, after Caesar is imprisoned in a primate &#8220;sanctuary,&#8221; this  is a film that masterfully demonstrates how much can be done without  dialogue. There&#8217;s an old adage in filmmaking that advises that it&#8217;s  better to show it than say it, and rarely have I seen a blockbuster film  that took this advice to heart quite so skillfully, well into the  closing credits in fact. There are snatches of sign language complete  with helpful subtitles, but anyone can see on the protagonist&#8217;s face  that he&#8217;s working on a plan.</p>
<p>The human actors in the piece are more than capable, but they largely occupy the positions the story requires of them. <strong>James Franco</strong> is the scientist hoping to create a viable Alzheimer&#8217;s treatment for  his father, which inadvertently works so well at making the apes smart. <strong>John Lithgow</strong>,  playing his father, probably lends the most soul to the human  characters and serves as Caesar&#8217;s erstwhile grandfather. The lovely <strong>Freida Pinto</strong>, after injecting a bit of exposition early on, spends the rest of the film relegated to being Franco&#8217;s presumed love interest. <strong>Tom Felton</strong>,  best known to audiences as Harry Potter&#8217;s nemesis Draco Malfoy, here  sports a spitting American accent as he torments the apes in the primate  sanctuary.</p>
<p><em>Rise of the Planet of the Apes</em> certainly  doesn&#8217;t eschew the satirical bent of its predecessors, but it really  feels much more like a speculative science fiction film than a mirror to  our times. It approaches the apes from an ape perspective more than a  human one, and this ends up being one of its greatest strengths. It  doesn&#8217;t so much ask the question of what people in monkey costumes can  say about society, but rather, simply, what might it look like if an ape  were suddenly able to compete with us mentally? As this movie surmises,  he might have better things to do than sit around debating philosophy  with us. &#8211;  <strong>[DVD] [Blu-Ray]</strong></p>
</div>
<div><strong><br />
</strong></div>
<div><strong>Action/Drama/Sci-Fi</p>
<p></strong><strong> </strong><strong> </strong><strong>Rated PG-13</strong></p>
</div>
<div><strong>Release Date: 12/13/11</strong></div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://thevideostation.com/blog/2011/12/16/rise-of-the-planet-of-the-apes-reviewed-by-will/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>COWBOYS &amp; ALIENS &#8211; Reviewed by Will</title>
		<link>http://thevideostation.com/blog/2011/12/08/cowboys-aliens-reviewed-by-will/</link>
		<comments>http://thevideostation.com/blog/2011/12/08/cowboys-aliens-reviewed-by-will/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Dec 2011 20:26:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>blogadmin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[action/adventure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[blu-ray]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[movie reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sci-fi / fantasy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thevideostation.com/blog/?p=5693</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[  The mixing of the Western and sci-fi genres is nothing new. It goes back at least as far as when Singing Cowboy Gene Autry descended into the super-advanced underground civilization of Murania in the kooky but fun 1935 serial The Phantom Empire. Over the years, it&#8217;s been done with varied success, ranging from [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div><a href="../"><strong> </strong></a><strong> </strong><img class="alignleft" style="margin: 5px;" title="Cowboys &amp; Aliens DVD 2011" src="http://www.thevideostation.com/boxart/CowboysAndAliens2011.jpg" alt="" width="98" height="140" />The mixing of the Western and sci-fi genres is nothing new. It goes back at least as far as when Singing Cowboy <strong>Gene Autry</strong> descended into the super-advanced underground civilization of Murania in the kooky but fun 1935 serial <strong><em>The Phantom Empire</em></strong>. Over the years, it&#8217;s been done with varied success, ranging from the &#8220;James Bond Western,&#8221; <em><strong>Wild Wild Wes</strong></em>t, to <strong>Joss </strong><strong> </strong><strong>Whedon</strong>&#8217;s brilliant but short-lived <strong><em>Firefly/Serenity</em></strong> franchise. But never before has the juxtaposition been announced quite as clearly as by the title <em><strong>Cowboys &amp; Aliens</strong></em>.</p>
<p><span id="more-5693"></span>Therein lies the rub: <em>Cowboys &amp; Aliens</em> is a movie that somehow fails to live up to its title. There are indeed  cowboys and aliens aplenty in it, but it takes itself a little too  seriously to earn its playful-sounding moniker. That&#8217;s not to say it  isn&#8217;t any fun at all. Particularly during its first half hour, which  establishes the amnesiac stranger Jake Lonergan (a relentlessly dour-faced <strong>Daniel Craig</strong>), cattle patriarch Woodrow Dolarhyde (<strong>Harrison Ford</strong>)  and the dying boomtown of Absolution, Arizona Territory. The early  scenes, replete with fisticuffs and dueling dagger stares, are actually  fairly (maybe unintentionally) funny. Later on, when strange objects  appear in the sky and start blasting the town, things get a little  uneven.</p>
<p>Disregarding the title altogether, it&#8217;s hard to say exactly why the souffle that is <em>Cowboys &amp; Aliens</em> never manages to rise all the way. It has all the right ingredients&#8211;a good cast, a good director (<strong>Jon &#8220;<em>Iron Man</em>&#8221; Favreau</strong>),  and a script that could be a heck of a lot worse. The writers manage to  find a few nice moments to remind us that these characters are out of  their depth when it comes to alien invasions, and even things we today  take for granted are novel to them (like flight). But whatever the  reason, it doesn&#8217;t quite cohere as it should. Maybe someday it&#8217;ll gain  some kind of cult status as the oddity it is. Until then, you could do a  lot worse. &#8211; <strong>[DVD] [Blu-Ray]</strong></p>
</div>
<div><strong>Action/Sci-Fi/Thriller</strong></div>
<div><strong>Rated PG-13</strong></div>
<div><strong><br />
</strong></div>
<div><strong>DVD Release Date: 12/6/11</strong></div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://thevideostation.com/blog/2011/12/08/cowboys-aliens-reviewed-by-will/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>ANOTHER EARTH &#8211; Reviewed by Bruce</title>
		<link>http://thevideostation.com/blog/2011/12/02/another-earth-reviewed-by-bruce/</link>
		<comments>http://thevideostation.com/blog/2011/12/02/another-earth-reviewed-by-bruce/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Dec 2011 14:23:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>blogadmin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[blu-ray]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[drama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[recommendations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sci-fi / fantasy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thevideostation.com/blog/?p=5649</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[   If,  like me, you&#8217;ve been both fascinated and unnerved by the recent  articles describing neutrinos that may be travelling faster than the  speed of light, you may also have developed a new, less skeptical view  of things previously filed under &#8220;science fiction,&#8221; or at least are no  [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div><a href="../"><strong> </strong></a><strong> </strong><strong> </strong><img class="alignright" style="margin: 5px;" title="Another Earth DVD 2011" src="http://www.thevideostation.com/boxart/AnotherEarth2011.jpg" alt="" width="109" height="140" />If,  like me, you&#8217;ve been both fascinated and unnerved by the recent  articles describing neutrinos that may be travelling faster than the  speed of light, you may also have developed a new, less skeptical view  of things previously filed under &#8220;science fiction,&#8221; or at least are no  longer automatically chuckling at them. This is one way to approach the marvellously subtle, yet thrilling, <strong><em>Another Earth</em></strong>.</p>
<p><span id="more-5649"></span>On the night humans learn of another habitable planet that is approaching Earth, our protagonist Rhoda Williams (<strong>Brit Marling</strong>) is celebrating her acceptance to M.I.T.,  and, while driving home, gawking out her window at the new planet.  Another car, filled with a man, his pregnant wife, and their young son,  are in her unseen path, and meet with a terrible fate when she runs into  them head-on. Rhoda spends  the next four years in prison for this, and when she is released, the  new planet is much closer to Earth, and more dramatic events are  imminent. With that new planet invariably hanging heavily in the sky  (ominously? beautifully? expectantly?), Rhoda goes about searching for some meaning to her shattered life. She is drawn to John Burroughs (<strong>William Mapother</strong>),  the surviving father of the car wreck, and the resultant encounters are  both unexpected and realistic in their poignancy of two broken souls  cleaving together.</p>
<p>Brit Marling not only plays Rhoda, but also co-wrote the original script, along with director <strong>Mike Cahill</strong>.  She is magnetic in this film, always resisting the opportunity for  histrionics, which many actors would have indulged in. She plays Rhoda  very quietly, with an almost blank face, yet one on which we can read  the deep currents of pain underneath. Despite that pain, she very much  wants to re-connect with reality, not being content with the anodyne.  Marling&#8217;s subtlety is all the more astonishing that as dramatic moments  accrete, so too does the cumulative power, culminating in one of the  best final shots I&#8217;ve ever seen.</p>
<p>The look of the film is also  quite beautiful, loaded with subdued earth tones &#8211; lots of olive and  brown, but deep black, too. And it was shot with an $8,000 camera &#8211; the  Sony EX3.</p>
<p>Could this be the start of a new breed of actresses (along with <strong>Michelle Williams</strong>, for now) who believe in a more introspectively penetrating style of acting? Let&#8217;s hope so &#8211; it sure is exciting. &#8211; <strong>[DVD] [Blu-Ray]<br />
</strong></p>
</div>
<div><strong>Drama/Sci-Fi<br />
</strong><br />
<strong>Rated PG-13</strong></div>
<div><strong><br />
</strong></div>
<div><strong>DVD Release Date: 11/29/11<br />
</strong></div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://thevideostation.com/blog/2011/12/02/another-earth-reviewed-by-bruce/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>SUPER 8 &#8211; Reviewed by Will</title>
		<link>http://thevideostation.com/blog/2011/11/25/super-8-reviewed-by-will/</link>
		<comments>http://thevideostation.com/blog/2011/11/25/super-8-reviewed-by-will/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Nov 2011 18:56:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>blogadmin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[blu-ray]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[movie reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[recommendations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sci-fi / fantasy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[suspense/thrillers]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thevideostation.com/blog/?p=5613</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ In  1958, an 11-year old kid in Scottsdale, Arizona borrowed his dad&#8217;s 8-mm  movie camera to fulfill the requirements of the Boy Scouts&#8217; photography  merit badge. His first film was a western in which the big special  effect was a staged crash of his Lionel model train set. He caught [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong> </strong><img class="alignright" style="margin: 10px;" title="Super 8 DVD" src="http://www.thevideostation.com/boxart/Super8_2011.jpg" alt="" width="98" height="140" />In  1958, an 11-year old kid in Scottsdale, Arizona borrowed his dad&#8217;s 8-mm  movie camera to fulfill the requirements of the Boy Scouts&#8217; photography  merit badge. His first film was a western in which the big special  effect was a staged crash of his Lionel model train set. He caught the  filmmaking bug, and never stopped making movies. His name was <strong>Steven Spielberg</strong>. A quarter century later, in 1982, Spielberg was fresh off the shoot for <em><strong>E.T.</strong></em>,  a film which deeply connected Spielberg both with his own childhood and  with his young stars, who became, in his own words, something of a  second family. Around this time he came across an article in the LA  Times headlined &#8220;The Beardless Wonders of Film Making,&#8221; which featured a  group of teenage kids who had made waves at that year&#8217;s Super 8-mm film  festival showing their own clever homemade movies. No doubt inspired by  nostalgia and flush with paternal emotion, Spielberg bravely decided to  have his producer contact two of those kids and hire them to edit and  restore his own childhood 8-mm films. Their names were <strong>J.J. Abrams</strong> (<em>&#8220;Alias,&#8221;</em> <em>&#8220;Lost,&#8221;</em> <em><strong>Star Trek</strong></em>) and <strong>Matt Reeves</strong> (<em><strong>Cloverfield</strong></em>, <em><strong>Let Me In</strong></em>).</p>
<p><span id="more-5613"></span>Fast-forward another quarter century to <em><strong>Super 8</strong></em>,  directed by Abrams and produced by Spielberg, in which the grandest  set-piece (among many) is a train crash. This is a film which celebrates  not only Abrams&#8217; childhood filmmaking adventures, but the great early  Spielberg films that had inspired him and his friends. His decision to  set his story in 1979 goes a long way in making his evocation of those  films so successful, and his cast of young actors seem transported en  masse from the occasionally-great but generally fondly-remembered  adventure films of the era (<em>E.T.</em>, <em><strong>Goonies</strong></em>, <em><strong>Explorers</strong></em>, et al.). The kids in those movies had a tendency to talk over each other in an <strong> </strong><strong>Altman</strong>-esque pitter-patter that lent a distinct comic realism to their relationships. Lo and behold, the kids in <em>Super 8</em> talk that way too.</p>
<p>Of course, just as in those movies, there&#8217;s something otherworldly afoot. Something the USAF  was hauling cross-country in that crashed train. Witness to the crash  are our young heroes, on a clandestine wee-hours location shoot for  their DIY zombie mystery  movie. They don&#8217;t quite catch a glimpse of the something that crawls out  of the wreckage, but&#8211;aha!&#8211;their trusty Super 8 does. Trouble is,  it&#8217;ll take a few days to get their film developed, and a lot can happen  in a small town in a few days when something unusual is on the prowl.  Car engines are suddenly missing from under their hoods, a service  station gets smashed, ham radio operators hear strange murmurs on Air  Force frequencies, and the sheriff has mysteriously vanished.</p>
<p>One  trademark feature of Spielberg&#8217;s films (which is sometimes overlooked)  is that, with few exceptions, their protagonists come from broken  families. <em>E.T.</em> is really all about the father who ran away to Mexico. The kids in <strong><em>Jurassic Park</em></strong> were mostly sent there as a diversion from their parents&#8217; divorce. Even  Dr. Henry &#8220;Indiana&#8221; Jones and his dad fell out after mom died. <em>Super 8</em>, which so reverently emulates Spielberg&#8217;s magic, follows the same pattern: its father and son (<strong>Kyle Chandler</strong> and <strong>Joel Courtney</strong>)  are freshly reeling from the steel-mill accident that claimed the  mother&#8217;s life. Complicating matters is the son&#8217;s infatuation with the  daughter (an excellent <strong>Elle Fanning</strong>&#8211;yes, she is <strong>Dakota</strong>&#8217;s little sister) of the man who may have been responsible.</p>
<p>Ultimately, <em>Super 8</em> stands on its own as a fun, atmospheric sci-adventure  with superb production values and well-above-average characterization.  As easy (and fun) as it is to watch it with an eye for all the visual  and thematic allusions to the Spielberg canon, this is probably the  first real J.J. Abrams movie, and easily his best. While his <em>Star Trek</em> sometimes felt a little breathless, <em>Super 8</em> takes its time establishing setting and character back story, to a much  greater extent, in fact, than most Hollywood blockbusters have for many  years. There&#8217;s no question that its imitative qualities are both  deliberate and affectionate, and in the context of the shared history of  its creators, almost poignant. It wouldn&#8217;t surprise me in the least if  some of the young viewers who watch it might be inspired to find a  camera and make their own movie. I&#8217;m sure nothing would make Spielberg  and Abrams happier.</p>
<p>P.S. Make sure you keep watching when the credits roll, or you&#8217;ll miss the best part. -<strong> [DVD] [Blu-Ray]<br />
</strong></p>
<p><strong>Mystery/Sci-Fi/Thriller</strong><strong> </strong></p>
<p><strong> </strong></p>
<p><strong>Rated PG-13</strong></p>
<p><strong>DVD Release Date: 11/22/11<br />
</strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://thevideostation.com/blog/2011/11/25/super-8-reviewed-by-will/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>CONAN THE BARBARIAN &#8211; Reviewed by David</title>
		<link>http://thevideostation.com/blog/2011/11/25/conan-the-barbarian-reviewed-by-david/</link>
		<comments>http://thevideostation.com/blog/2011/11/25/conan-the-barbarian-reviewed-by-david/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Nov 2011 18:56:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>blogadmin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[action/adventure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[blu-ray]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[movie reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sci-fi / fantasy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thevideostation.com/blog/?p=5611</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ Playing writer Robert E. Howard’s  fictional warrior convincingly requires one to possess big muscles,  skill with a sword and, apparently, a thick Austrian accent. Because  while Jason Momoa, who assumes the title role in this new version of Conan the Barbarian, meets the first two requirements, the film suffers immeasurably for [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div><strong> </strong><img class="alignleft" style="margin: 10px;" title="Conan the Barbarian" src="http://www.thevideostation.com/boxart/ConanTheBarbarian2011.jpg" alt="" width="98" height="140" />Playing writer <strong>Robert E. Howard</strong>’s  fictional warrior convincingly requires one to possess big muscles,  skill with a sword and, apparently, a thick Austrian accent. Because  while <strong>Jason Momoa</strong>, who assumes the title role in this new version of <strong><em>Conan the Barbarian</em></strong>, meets the first two requirements, the film suffers immeasurably for his not being <strong>Arnold Schwarzenegger</strong>.</p>
<p><span id="more-5611"></span>As in Howard’s original pulp stories, the Conan here is a Cimmerian born during battle and raised by a blacksmith father (<strong>Ron Perlman</strong>). From there the film’s trio of screenwriters concoct a new plot, in which Conan seeks revenge against a malevolent warlord (<strong>Stephen Lang</strong>) bent on conquering the world via a mask made out of the bones of dead kings.</p>
<p>The problem with Momoa is presence. He doesn’t have any. He probably got the role because of his six-pack abs  and model-pretty face. But not only does he deliver his lines somewhat  woodenly, and in a low growl, he behaves more like an entitled surfer  boy than an uncivilized grunt, and seems to believe that glowering  through liberally applied mascara makes him intimidating.</p>
<p><strong>Marcus Nispel</strong> is the director, and that just compounds the issue, because hiring the guy who made the awesomely uninspired reboots of <strong><em>The Texas Chainsaw Massacre</em></strong> and <em><strong>Friday the 13th</strong></em> is always a good idea. He has not the skill to craft anything creative,  be it action sequences or scenes in general, or to compensate for Momoa’s deficient performance. He stages the chases and various swordfights competently, sure, but some of the more interesting sequences, like Momoa’s clash with warriors made of dirt, deserve to be better than merely proficient.</p>
<p>The only one who brings anything interesting to the party is Stephen Lang, a veteran actor probably best known for chewing the scenery as badass soldiers in <em><strong>Avatar</strong></em> and Fox-TV’s <em><strong>Terra Nova</strong></em>.  He’s the best thing in them, and he’s the best thing here, imbuing his  pony-tailed villain with a wonderfully fierce spirit, be it while  goading Momoa during a swordfight, or uttering cheesy dialogue. “My wife will make me a god, and we will cast all rivals into oceans of blood,” he proclaims to <strong>Rachel Nichols</strong>’ damsel-in-distress at one point, almost managing to make it sound believable. Almost.</p>
<p>As a whole, the thing is grittier than the Schwarzenegger  version. That is, it tries to be a mite more realistic, which is an  interesting tack for a film like this to take. As well there’s actually  far less use of special effects than you might expect, dirt-warriors,  tentacled creature and finale notwithstanding. For once, though, I  wouldn’t have minded getting a CGI show. It would have distracted me  from the lackluster lump of beefcake at the center of the movie. &#8211; <strong>[DVD] [Blu-Ray]</strong></p>
</div>
<div><strong>Action/Adventure/Fantasy</p>
<p></strong><strong> </strong> <strong>Rated R</strong></p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://thevideostation.com/blog/2011/11/25/conan-the-barbarian-reviewed-by-david/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

